https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1P0T3Il16sLsm0O5vIiHbueqnlV68WeU2p3m3Git4FK8/edit?usp=sharing
top of page

Reflection Journal Rubric – AAC and LAMP Foundations

This rubric makes expectations for learners to know they’re being assessed not just on knowledge, but on application, empathy, and accessibility awareness—which fits with AAC and LAMP’s mission.

 

Grading Scheme:

  • Total Points: 20 (5 criteria × 4 points each)

  • Mastery defined as 15 points or higher, with no “Unsatisfactory” ratings.

Criteria

Unsatisfactory

Developing

Proficient

Exemplary

Understanding of AAC/LAMP Concepts
Little or no reference to AAC/LAMP; inaccurate or missing key ideas
Mentions AAC/LAMP but with limited clarity or accuracy
Clear explanation of AAC/LAMP concepts with mostly accurate application
Deep, accurate understanding; integrates AAC/LAMP principles with insight and precision
Connection to Practice
No link to real-world communication support
Vague or minimal examples of application
Clear examples of how AAC/LAMP strategies apply to practice
Rich, diverse examples; demonstrates creativity and adaptability in applying strategies
Reflection & Personal Insight
Superficial or missing reflection
Some reflection but lacks depth or personal connection
Thoughtful reflection with clear personal insight
Highly reflective; demonstrates growth, empathy, and actionable takeaways
Accessibility & Inclusivity Awareness
No mention of accessibility or inclusivity
Limited or generic mention
Clear attention to accessibility and inclusivity in reflection
Strong, consistent integration of accessibility and inclusivity principles
Organization & Clarity
Disorganized, incomplete, or unclear writing
Some organization but inconsistent clarity
Well-organized, clear, and complete writing
Exceptionally polished, professional, and engaging presentation
bottom of page